tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-307156029689617633.post6726071904638780263..comments2023-11-02T01:08:18.901-07:00Comments on gibbsbarrister sportslaw: Liar, Liar - Should Polygraph Evidence be used in Sports Tribunals?GIBBSBARRISTERhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18002028120352475853noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-307156029689617633.post-27598295003657394032013-03-16T08:17:08.781-07:002013-03-16T08:17:08.781-07:00If polygraph type evidence isn't acceptable in...If polygraph type evidence isn't acceptable in the vast majority of jurisdictions in criminal trials (quite rightly so), the use of something so manifestly unreliable (at the best of times) would be deeply unwise in something quasi-criminal such as doping.Will Tnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-307156029689617633.post-64946038084354826622013-03-14T06:16:38.876-07:002013-03-14T06:16:38.876-07:00Relying on polygraph results for any purpose other...Relying on polygraph results for any purpose other than entertainment is a mistake. While the lie detector may make for a successful ratings gimmick on tawdry television talk shows, it has no scientific basis whatsoever.<br /><br />I'm a co-founder of AntiPolygraph.org, a non-profit, public interest website dedicated to exposing and ending polygraph-related waste, fraud and abuse. See our free book, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, for a thorough debunking of polygraphy (as well as detailed information on how to pass this bogus test whether or not one is telling the truth):<br /><br />https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf<br />George Maschkehttps://antipolygraph.orgnoreply@blogger.com